----- MAINTENANCE ----- >> RBA (rule-based action) for error of omission (maintenance) Written materials: Yes Table 20-5 [preparation]: Not relevant (written materials are licensed) Table 20-6 [administrative control]: HEP that procedure will not be used (maintenance, item 7): HEP = 3.00E-01, EF = 5.00E+00 selected Table 20-7 [procedural items]: HEP when procedures are available but are not used (item 5) HEP = 5.00E-02, EF = 5.00E+00 selected Procedure used without checkoff Short list (<=10 items) (item 3) HEP = 3.00E-03, EF = 3.00E+00 selected => HEP omission (procedure not used) = 1.50E-02, EF = 9.74E+00 => HEP omission (procedure used) = 2.10E-03, EF := 3.00E+00 => HEP omission (total) = 1.69E-02, EF = 9.12E+00 >> RBA (rule-based action) for error of commission Table 20-13 (Valve selection) Clearly labeled, not in a group that have same shape, size, state and tag (item 1) HEP = 1.00E-03, EF = 3.00E+00 selected Table 20-14 (Stuck valve detection) Operation with a rising stem but no position indicator (item 3) HEP = 5.00E-03, EF = 3.00E+00 selected => HEP commission = 6.32E-03, EF = 2.61E+00 => Joined HEP (omission + commission) for maintenance = 2.28E-02; EF = 7.70E+00 >> PSF (performance shaping factors) Table 20-15 [tagging levels]: Tags are not accounted for individually Nominal HEP used (level 2) Table 20-16 [stress/experience] Skilled person (>6 months experience) Stress level: optimum, step-by-step (item 2) => PSF-modified HEP = 2.28E-02, EF = 7.70E+00 >> RF (recovery factors) Table 20-22 [recovery factors] Without written materials (item 2) HEP divided by 2 since maintenance (item 10) THERP RF = 1.00E-01, THERP RF EF = 5.00E+00 selected ASEP recovery factors Post-mainteance or post-calibration testing Item 6 selected ASEP RF = 1.00E-02, ASEP RF EF = 1.00E+01 selected The ASEP recovery factor suits better the action type: using ASEP RF => RF = 1.00E-02, EF = 1.00E+01 => HEP for maintenance = 2.28E-04; EF = 2.17E+01 ----- TESTS (SFT/IFT) ----- >> RBA (rule-based action) for error of omission (test) Written materials: Yes Table 20-5 [preparation]: Not relevant (written materials are licensed) Table 20-6 [administrative control]: HEP that procedure will not be used (test, item 6): HEP = 5.00E-02, EF = 5.00E+00 selected Table 20-7 [procedural items]: HEP when procedures are available but are not used (item 5) HEP = 5.00E-02, EF = 5.00E+00 selected Procedure used without checkoff Long list (>10 items) (item 4) HEP = 1.00E-02, EF = 3.00E+00 selected => HEP omission (procedure not used) = 2.50E-03, EF = 9.74E+00 => HEP omission (procedure used) = 9.50E-03, EF := 3.00E+00 => HEP omission (total) = 1.31E-02, EF = 3.86E+00 => Joined HEP (omission + commission) for tests = 2.10E-02; EF = 2.90E+00 >> PSF (performance shaping factors) Table 20-15 [tagging levels]: Tags are not accounted for individually Nominal HEP used (level 2) Table 20-16 [stress/experience] Skilled person (>6 months experience) Stress level: optimum, step-by-step (item 2) => PSF-modified HEP = 2.10E-02, EF = 2.90E+00 >> RF (recovery factors) Table 20-22 [recovery factors] Without written materials (item 2) THERP RF = 2.00E-01, THERP RF EF = 5.00E+00 selected ASEP recovery factors No appropriate ASEP recovery factors available ASEP RF = 1.00E+00, ASEP RF EF = 0.00E+00 selected The THERP recovery factor suits better the action type: using THERP RF => RF = 2.00E-01, EF = 5.00E+00 => HEP for tests = 4.20E-03; EF = 6.88E+00 >> Equivalent HEP (combines test and maintenance) Maintenance frequency = 1.00E-01 Test frequency = 2.00E+00 => Equivalent HEP = 4.06E-03, EF = 6.83E+00 >> Reduction factor Ratio fault occurence / fault detection frequencies = 2.1 / 1 => HEP reduction factor = 8.07E-01 => Final HEP (median) = 3.27E-03, EF = 6.83E+00 => Final HEP (mean) = 6.47E-03, EF = 6.83E+00